Recent high profile, the death of Jade Goody, British reality TV star with, cervical cancer, increases awareness of the deadly disease.
Cervical cancer takes the life around 253,500 women worldwide each year, in accordance with the National Cervical Cancer Coalition (NCCC). This threat is to lead to research efforts agreed at the cause of cervical cancer and effective treatment in the past few years.
Scientists have found that a virus called human papillomavirus (HPV) triggers at least 70% of cervical cancer. As a result of this discovery developed a vaccine that claim protects girls between the ages of 11 to 26, two General strains of HPV.
In addition, while not actually considered the cause of cancer of the neck, are factors that increase the risk of getting the disease. These risk factors include:
Long term use of birth control pills: the use of birth control pills for more than 4 years may increase the risk of cancer among women with neck HPV infection.
Not regular research: cancer of the neck is more popular among women, who do not have regular Pap tests.
HPV infection HPV infection: is not completely eliminated may cause cervical cancer in certain women. Because these viruses are transmitted through sexual contact, the risk of HPV infection increases the number of sexual partners.
Smoking: smoking tobacco increases the risk of cancer of the neck of the women infected with HPV.
Weakened immune system: infection with HIV, or the use of medicines, which disable the immune system, increases the risk of cervical cancer.
Knowing the cause of cervical cancer and risk factors, help prevent women getting the disease.
However, when the women diagnosed with cervical cancer, is a very difficult decision. Which treatment is most effective? Which treatment he or she choose?
The treatment of cancer is the subject of a very controversial, as only one venture outside the sphere of the mainstream medical authority in the field of alternative medicine. Has very good reasons for such a heated controversy. In its simplest sense it is a conflict between the freedom of information and the self interest (profit).
Health care Dollar is in US industry, trillion themselves. The treatment of cancer accounted for 72.1 billion USD estimated revenue in 2004, in accordance with the National Cancer Institute. Is the naive hope that such a profitable industry enters the public interests before their own interest.
In fact, according to a recent documentary on "60 minutes", are twice as many lobbyists working on behalf of the pharmaceutical industry, there are congressmen. They are paid in order to obtain support for the creator of the right to the legislation, which protects the interests of producers of drugs and to dyskredytuje cancer treatment of the alternative media.
Alternative treatments and cures of cancer have been extensively documented in the last hundred years, a significant part of that unfortunately was put on hold, or information deliberately discredited because it poses a threat to those interests which profit from the patented treatments.
Although it is beyond the scope of this article to discuss specific alternative cancer treatments, here are some general guidelines that will help you discover important information for your own personal education and research.
First, you must be willing to become your own authority. Health and life, after all, and you have the right to make a final decision on the treatment you receive.For more information or have access to, the better Your position to truly make an informed choice.
Secondly, you must be willing to look beyond the conventional, mainstream sources, if you are going to really find the information that is being ignored.
Thirdly, it must allow the criteria selections to include anecdotal evidence, because it will never be FDA approved, research blindly in favour of any treatment, which may not be patented or given, for significant profit.
Rote is the answer to dyskredytuje effective alternative treatments of all kinds, "there is no clinical evidence that proves that it works." Although it is true, it is also confusing. This means that treatment does not work. There is no clinical evidence, because there has been no clinical trials, and never will be, because most of the alternatives cannot be patented. Therefore there is no incentive to pay for clinical trials.
Anecdotal, first person accounts of successful cancer treatment, alternative can offer new choices and directions to explore. Legitimate research with the more liberal States often can support these opinions and help you in making informed decisions, which may lead to successful healing, even cancer.
No comments:
Post a Comment