This investigation started by My research for my book and could demonstrate that easily all cancers can be linked to chemicals and radiation causes, but there is such, that was an exception. Cuckoo in the nest and was was to cervical cancer. This cancer is now firmly established and commonly attributed to caused by a virus so many articles in this Ezine more than testify. However, the evidence proves otherwise and must demonstrate without a doubt that what have I said is true, but prior to the evidence in support of this heretical statement, let us take a look at some of the information regarding the disease. Guidance to the cause of the disease can be found in the information, which now follows.
Worldwide, cervical cancer is the third most common type of cancer in women. In accordance with the NCCC (National Cervical Cancer Coalition) around 14,000 women in the United States are diagnosed with the disease each year and more than provides women die each year from this disease. However, the number of women getting the disease in the Western world is very few compared to the rest of the world. Women in developing countries represent approximately 85% of both the annual cancer of the neck (estimated at 493,000 cases worldwide) and the annual deaths on cervical cancer (estimated at 273,500 deaths worldwide). In fact, whereas breast cancer is the leading cancer for women in the West, in most developing countries, cancer of the neck remains number one cause of cancer deaths among women. It is these statistics in mind, because what they tell us is very important as far as determining the cause of cervical cancer.
Initially, it was taken aback by the revelation and that the virus caused cervical cancer, but then I started to wonder, what was that led doctors almost unanimously adopted this idea while all other cancers has clearly shown that chemicals (or radiation) was responsible. As I looked into this more deeply, I came across the most fantastic riddle. You see, what set of doctors along a path in search of the cause of the viral disease was triggered by the report unclear in regional medical journal in Venice. Was performed by an Italian physician, surgeon and amateur epidemiolist named Rigoni Stern in 1842. It has an analysis of 150 000 deaths from the Veronese in the years 1760-1839 and concluded that with women, which die 74,184, 1288 with them were nuns. The cause of death of the nuns greatly, but many had died of breast cancer, five times more common than other women. Incidently he correctly assigned to one of the reasons for the growth of breast cancer in the nuns when compared to other women due to the Corsets they wore). He recorded four deaths from uterine cancer (cancer of the neck was not distinguished from other cancers of the uterus), while he had Expected at least six, based on 361 cases in the other women 72,896.
From this analysis slightly unclear others Saw this as proof that it was little or no cancer neck among Catholic nuns in comparison with the rest of the Italian women. Subsequent doctors endeavoured to expand on the report is unclear, adding various invented details, including the idea that cancer of the neck in prostitutes was prevalent. So from mit that nuns were to be celibate and still rare among them was cervical cancer and that the disease was said to be popular among prostitutes can only mean one thing. Cancer of the neck was due to something sexually transmitted and it was not long before this speculation became accepted as fact. Professor Skranbanek remedy the situation in perspective when He said that "a reference to the communication from the Italian unclear became de riguer in the opening paragraphs of articles on the aetiology of cancer of the neck of the uterus, but how many authors I have read the orignal? Skranbanek, appeared as Dr. Griffiths Luton Hospital, that the basis on which the theory that the virus sexually transmitted diseases was a red herring, which led to doctors after a false trail before.
One hundred years or more of the search was a search for the elusive virus, Smegma and Causing simultaneously believes that were the cause, but was eventually proven unfounded. Then came along Professor Harald zur Hausen and his team, which found that many of the HPV virus strains can be found in women, that cervical cancer. Found elusive virus and since then has established a scientific hypothesis. But it is invalid!
If you have HPV do not cause cancer of the neck as I said, although most, if not all medical would disagree with me, then what can I say is the cause of the disease? To answer this question we must first see a fantastic statistics mentioned earlier in this Treaty, because it gives us a vital clue. "Women in developing countries represent approximately 85% of both the annual cancer of the neck".
Did you know that the Office of rare diseases (ORD), national institutes of health (NIH), in the United States lists of cancer of the neck as a "rare disease"? This means that cervical cancer, or a subtype of the disease, affects less than 200,000 people in the United States, a country that has more than 300 million people. In accordance with the estimated new cases and deaths from cancer of the neck of the uterus (uterine neck) in the United States in 2007 by the National Cancer Institute are 11,150 new cases of deaths approximately 3,650. This compares to 470,000 new cases and deaths every year, 230,000 to cancer of the neck in the world, most of which occur in the developing countries. The good news is that cancer of the neck of the incidents are on the decline in the West and it is considered that the introduction of the Pap test is responsible. This may be partly TRUE, but as the one explained that cancer of the neck was already in decline before the Pap test?
The World Health Organization says that "more than 80% of the weight of this disease is readily detectable and preventable is borne by developing countries" to illustrate this WHO published a world map showing projected global occurrence of cancer of the neck for the year 2005 in various countries, and is the most informative. The reason I say this because I have seen almost an exact duplicate of this map elsewhere, that has nothing to do with cervical cancer. A map showing the energy consumption of the national wood fuels around the world. The correlation is notable and Self evident. OVERLAYS STATISTICS WORLD MAP WITH THE DISTRIBUTION OF CERVICAL CANCER AND THE MAP OF COUNTRIES THAT USE WOOD AS THEIR MAIN FUEL AND YOU CAN FIND A NEARLY PERFECT MATCH. This is not the case.
Thank You
Fred Harding
Writer and historian
No comments:
Post a Comment